<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en"><title>News on Medicare</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/topic/medicare" rel="alternate"></link><id>http://economicpolicyinfo.com/topic/medicare</id><updated>2011-12-21T11:30:21Z</updated><entry><title>Alice Rivlin: "We're Flirting with Disaster"</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/alice-rivlin-flirting-disaster-4880546a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2011-12-21T11:30:21Z</updated><author><name>Kiplinger.com</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2011-12-21:/tax-policy/alice-rivlin-flirting-disaster-4880546a/</id><summary type="html">&lt;div id="subtitle"&gt;The Former &lt;a title="The White House" href="/topic/The+White+House" &gt;White House&lt;/a&gt; budget chief thinks Congress squandered its opportunity to rein in the national debt but may still come to its senses.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Former White House budget chief thinks Congress squandered its opportunity to rein in the national debt but may still come to its senses.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No one is more familiar with fiscal and political drama in D.C. than &lt;a title="Alice Rivlin" href="/topic/Alice+Rivl...</summary><category term="Personal Finance"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Federal Budget"></category><category term="Government Spending"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="Income Taxes"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="The White House"></category><category term="U.S. Office of Management and Budget"></category><category term="Medicaid"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="U.S. Federal Reserve"></category><category term="Italy"></category><category term="France"></category><category term="Western Europe"></category><category term="Greece"></category><category term="The Balkans"></category><category term="U.S. Congressional Budget Office"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="Alan Greenspan"></category><category term="Economic Stimulus"></category><category term="Pete Domenici"></category><category term="Alice Rivlin"></category><category term="Southern Europe"></category><category term="Bipartisan Policy Center"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="Capital Gains"></category><category term="Social Security Benefits"></category><category term="State of the Union Address"></category><category term="Social Security"></category></entry><entry><title>Senate Republicans offer tax-cut renewal plan</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/senate-republicans-offer-taxcut-renewal-plan-4867005a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2011-11-30T17:30:14Z</updated><author><name>Reuters US Online Report Politics News</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2011-11-30:/tax-policy/senate-republicans-offer-taxcut-renewal-plan-4867005a/</id><summary type="html">&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;WASHINGTON&lt;/span&gt; (&lt;span&gt;&lt;a title="Reuters Group plc" href="/topic/Reuters+Group+plc" &gt;Reuters&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;) - A pay freeze for federal workers would be extended for another three years as part of a &lt;span&gt;&lt;a title="U.S. Republican Party" href="/topic/U.S.+Republican+Party" &gt;Senate Republican&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; plan offered on Wednesday to cover the cost of &lt;span&gt;&lt;a title="Barack Obama" href="/topic/Barack+Obama" &gt;President Barack Obama&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;'s call to extend a popular payroll tax cut.&lt;/...</summary><category term="Economic Indicators"></category><category term="Labor Market"></category><category term="Job Growth"></category><category term="Economies"></category><category term="U.S. Economy"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Parties"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="U.S. Politics"></category><category term="World Politics"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="Harry Reid"></category><category term="Mitch McConnell"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Reuters Group plc"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="U.S. Democratic Party"></category><category term="U.S. Republican Party"></category><category term="Dean Heller"></category><category term="Thomas Ferraro"></category><category term="U.S. Conservative Politics"></category><category term="Lagging Economic Indicators"></category></entry><entry><title>Democrats reject latest deficit-cutting plan</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/democrats-reject-latest-deficitcutting-plan-4859852a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2011-11-18T16:00:21Z</updated><author><name>Reuters US Online Report Top News</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2011-11-18:/tax-policy/democrats-reject-latest-deficitcutting-plan-4859852a/</id><summary type="html">&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;WASHINGTON&lt;/span&gt; (&lt;span&gt;&lt;a title="Reuters Group plc" href="/topic/Reuters+Group+plc" &gt;Reuters&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;) - A high-profile congressional effort to trim stubborn budget deficits appeared near collapse on Friday as &lt;span&gt;Democrats&lt;/span&gt; rejected a scaled-back proposal from &lt;span&gt;Republicans&lt;/span&gt; that contained few tax increases.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With Democrats and &lt;a title="U.S. Republican Party" href="/topic/U.S.+Republican+Party" &gt;Republicans&lt;/a&gt; on a deficit-cutting "super committee" dea...</summary><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="George W. Bush"></category><category term="John Boehner"></category><category term="U.S. Congress"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="U.S. Department of the Treasury"></category><category term="U.S. House of Representatives"></category><category term="Europe"></category><category term="Reuters Group plc"></category><category term="U.S. Democratic Party"></category><category term="John Kerry"></category><category term="U.S. Republican Party"></category><category term="Dave Camp"></category></entry><entry><title>Deficit-cutting panel girds for failure</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/deficitcutting-panel-girds-failure-4859713a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2011-11-18T13:00:29Z</updated><author><name>Reuters US Online Report Top News</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2011-11-18:/tax-policy/deficitcutting-panel-girds-failure-4859713a/</id><summary type="html">&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;WASHINGTON&lt;/span&gt; (&lt;span&gt;&lt;a title="Reuters Group plc" href="/topic/Reuters+Group+plc" &gt;Reuters&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;) - A high-profile congressional effort to trim stubborn &lt;span&gt;U.S.&lt;/span&gt; budget deficits appeared near collapse on Friday as Democratic and Republican lawmakers were unable to agree on tax increases and benefit cuts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A 12-member "super committee" has until midnight on Wednesday to strike a deal that would save at least $1.2 trillion over 10 years. Members say they think ...</summary><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="George W. Bush"></category><category term="Washington, DC"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Europe"></category><category term="Reuters Group plc"></category><category term="U.S. Democratic Party"></category><category term="U.S. Republican Party"></category><category term="Xavier Becerra"></category><category term="Jeb Hensarling"></category><category term="Greg Valliere"></category><category term="Pat Toomey"></category><category term="Chris Van Hollen"></category><category term="Andy Sullivan"></category><category term="Thomas Ferraro"></category></entry><entry><title>Deficit committee locked in budget stalemate</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/deficit-committee-locked-budget-stalemate-4858166a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2011-11-16T17:01:42Z</updated><author><name>Reuters US Online Report Top News</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2011-11-16:/tax-policy/deficit-committee-locked-budget-stalemate-4858166a/</id><summary type="html">&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;WASHINGTON&lt;/span&gt; (&lt;span&gt;&lt;a title="Reuters Group plc" href="/topic/Reuters+Group+plc" &gt;Reuters&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;) - Budget talks in the Congress were locked in stalemate on Wednesday amid the disclosure of a Democratic offer last week that drew no Republican interest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With a deadline less than a week away, members of a 12-member "super committee" tasked with finding $1.2 trillion in budget savings over 10 years confronted the same barriers that have thwarted earlier efforts to rein ...</summary><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="Washington, DC"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Italy"></category><category term="AARP"></category><category term="Europe"></category><category term="Capitol Hill"></category><category term="The Pentagon"></category><category term="Greece"></category><category term="The Balkans"></category><category term="Google Inc."></category><category term="Reuters Group plc"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="U.S. Democratic Party"></category><category term="U.S. Republican Party"></category><category term="Americans for Tax Reform"></category><category term="Patty Murray"></category><category term="Jeb Hensarling"></category><category term="Lamar Alexander"></category><category term="Southern Europe"></category><category term="Andy Sullivan"></category><category term="Thomas Ferraro"></category><category term="Patriotic Millionaires for Fiscal Strength"></category></entry><entry><title>U.S. deficit panel could delay on taxes</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/deficit-panel-delay-taxes-4856405a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2011-11-14T17:00:08Z</updated><author><name>Reuters US Online Report Politics News</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2011-11-14:/tax-policy/deficit-panel-delay-taxes-4856405a/</id><summary type="html">&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;WASHINGTON&lt;/span&gt; (&lt;span&gt;&lt;a title="Reuters Group plc" href="/topic/Reuters+Group+plc" &gt;Reuters&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;) - &lt;a title="United States" href="/topic/United+States" &gt;U.S.&lt;/a&gt; lawmakers might opt to postpone tough tax decisions until next year as they struggle to forge a deficit-reduction deal over the coming week, congressional aides said on Monday.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With time running short, the "super committee" of six &lt;a title="U.S. Democratic Party" href="/topic/U.S.+Democratic+Party" &gt;Democra...</summary><category term="Personal Finance"></category><category term="Law"></category><category term="Tax Law"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="Washington, DC"></category><category term="Medicaid"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="The Pentagon"></category><category term="Reuters Group plc"></category><category term="U.S. Senate Committee on Finance"></category><category term="U.S. Democratic Party"></category><category term="U.S. Republican Party"></category><category term="Eric Cantor"></category><category term="Leon Panetta"></category><category term="Jeb Hensarling"></category><category term="U.S. House Committee on Ways and Means"></category><category term="Chris Van Hollen"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="Andy Sullivan"></category><category term="Thomas Ferraro"></category><category term="Insurance"></category><category term="Health Insurance"></category></entry><entry><title>Deficit panel could delay on taxes</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/deficit-panel-delay-taxes-4856191a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2011-11-14T11:30:10Z</updated><author><name>Reuters US Online Report Politics News</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2011-11-14:/tax-policy/deficit-panel-delay-taxes-4856191a/</id><summary type="html">&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;WASHINGTON&lt;/span&gt; (&lt;span&gt;&lt;a title="Reuters Group plc" href="/topic/Reuters+Group+plc" &gt;Reuters&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;) - &lt;span&gt;U.S.&lt;/span&gt; lawmakers might opt to postpone tough tax decisions until next year as they struggle to forge a deficit-reduction deal over the coming week, congressional aides said on Monday.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With time running short, the "super committee" of six &lt;a title="U.S. Democratic Party" href="/topic/U.S.+Democratic+Party" &gt;Democrats&lt;/a&gt; and six &lt;a title="U.S. Republican Part...</summary><category term="Personal Finance"></category><category term="Law"></category><category term="Tax Law"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="Washington, DC"></category><category term="Medicaid"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Reuters Group plc"></category><category term="U.S. Senate Committee on Finance"></category><category term="U.S. Democratic Party"></category><category term="U.S. Republican Party"></category><category term="Eric Cantor"></category><category term="Jeb Hensarling"></category><category term="U.S. House Committee on Ways and Means"></category><category term="Donna Smith"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="Andy Sullivan"></category><category term="Insurance"></category><category term="Health Insurance"></category></entry><entry><title>Deficit panel grapples with corporate taxes</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/deficit-panel-grapples-corporate-taxes-4843821a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2011-10-13T14:30:07Z</updated><author><name>Reuters US Online Report Business News</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2011-10-13:/tax-policy/deficit-panel-grapples-corporate-taxes-4843821a/</id><summary type="html">&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;WASHINGTON&lt;/span&gt; (&lt;span&gt;&lt;a title="Reuters Group plc" href="/topic/Reuters+Group+plc" &gt;Reuters&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;) - In a sign of possible progress in bipartisan &lt;span&gt;U.S.&lt;/span&gt; deficit talks, &lt;span&gt;Republicans&lt;/span&gt; seem more flexible on corporate taxes, a change that could help the congressional "super committee" chart the country's path back to fiscal health.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lobbyists familiar with the deficit negotiations said &lt;a title="U.S. Republican Party" href="/topic/U.S.+Republican+Part...</summary><category term="Law"></category><category term="Tax Law"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="George W. Bush"></category><category term="U.S. Congress"></category><category term="Medicaid"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="U.S. House of Representatives"></category><category term="Reuters Group plc"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="U.S. Senate Committee on Finance"></category><category term="U.S. Democratic Party"></category><category term="U.S. Republican Party"></category><category term="U.S. House Committee on Ways and Means"></category><category term="Patton Boggs LLP"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category></entry><entry><title>Deficit-cutting panel on short but tough road</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/deficitcutting-panel-short-tough-road-4829235a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2011-09-07T22:30:07Z</updated><author><name>Reuters US Online Report Top News</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2011-09-07:/tax-policy/deficitcutting-panel-short-tough-road-4829235a/</id><summary type="html">&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;WASHINGTON&lt;/span&gt; (&lt;span&gt;&lt;a title="Reuters Group plc" href="/topic/Reuters+Group+plc" &gt;Reuters&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;) - A congressional "super committee" convenes on Thursday to launch its search for at least $1.2 trillion in new deficit reductions as global financial markets look for signs that the world's largest economy is trying to get its fiscal house in order.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When the panel of 12 &lt;span&gt;&lt;a title="U.S. Democratic Party" href="/topic/U.S.+Democratic+Party" &gt;congressional Democrats&lt;/...</summary><category term="Economies"></category><category term="U.S. Economy"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="U.S. Politics"></category><category term="World Politics"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="Mitch McConnell"></category><category term="U.S. Congress"></category><category term="Medicaid"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="U.S. House of Representatives"></category><category term="Capitol Hill"></category><category term="Reuters Group plc"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="U.S. Democratic Party"></category><category term="U.S. Republican Party"></category><category term="Steny Hoyer"></category><category term="U.S. House Committee on Ways and Means"></category><category term="ISI Group Inc."></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="National Debt"></category><category term="Tea Party Movement"></category><category term="U.S. Conservative Politics"></category><category term="Social Security"></category></entry><entry><title>Factbox: Top contenders for deficit super committee</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/factbox-top-contenders-deficit-super-committee-4817109a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2011-08-08T14:30:53Z</updated><author><name>Reuters US Online Report Politics News</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2011-08-08:/tax-policy/factbox-top-contenders-deficit-super-committee-4817109a/</id><summary type="html">&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;(&lt;span&gt;&lt;a title="Reuters Group plc" href="/topic/Reuters+Group+plc" &gt;Reuters&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;) - Here are &lt;span&gt;U.S.&lt;/span&gt; lawmakers seen by analysts and congressional aides as some of the front-runners for selection to a 12-member "super committee" being set up to address budget and tax issues.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The panel will have six &lt;a title="U.S. Democratic Party" href="/topic/U.S.+Democratic+Party" &gt;Democrats&lt;/a&gt; and six Republicans, split evenly between the Senate and the &lt;span&gt;&lt;a title="U.S. Hous...</summary><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Parties"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="U.S. Politics"></category><category term="World Politics"></category><category term="U.S. Congressional Politics"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="George W. Bush"></category><category term="The White House"></category><category term="U.S. Office of Management and Budget"></category><category term="Nancy Pelosi"></category><category term="U.S. Congress"></category><category term="Medicaid"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="U.S. House of Representatives"></category><category term="Illinois"></category><category term="California"></category><category term="North Dakota"></category><category term="Pennsylvania"></category><category term="John McCain"></category><category term="Reuters Group plc"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="U.S. Senate Committee on Finance"></category><category term="U.S. Democratic Party"></category><category term="Upstate New York"></category><category term="U.S. Republican Party"></category><category term="U.S. House Budget Committee"></category><category term="U.S. Congressional Black Caucus"></category><category term="U.S. Senate Budget Committee"></category><category term="U.S. House Committee on Ways and Means"></category><category term="Chris Van Hollen"></category><category term="Donna Smith"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="Thomas Ferraro"></category><category term="Todd Eastham"></category><category term="Joe Biden"></category><category term="U.S. Liberal Politics"></category><category term="U.S. Conservative Politics"></category><category term="Social Security"></category><category term="Gang of Six"></category></entry><entry><title>Paul Ryan warns of fiscal and monetary clash</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/economic-policy/paul-ryan-warns-fiscal-monetary-clash-4785183a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2011-05-25T08:47:00Z</updated><author><name>Reuters US Online Report Politics News</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2011-05-25:/economic-policy/paul-ryan-warns-fiscal-monetary-clash-4785183a/</id><summary type="html">&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;WASHINGTON&lt;/span&gt; (&lt;span&gt;&lt;a title="Reuters Group plc" href="/topic/Reuters+Group+plc" &gt;Reuters&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;) - &lt;span&gt;&lt;a title="U.S. House Budget Committee" href="/topic/U.S.+House+Budget+Committee" &gt;House Budget Committee&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;a title="Paul Ryan" href="/topic/Paul+Ryan" &gt;Chairman Paul Ryan&lt;/a&gt; warned on Wednesday that big spending cuts are necessary now to control the deficit and prevent a collision between fiscal and monetary policy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Big deficits today are nothing more...</summary><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="Washington, DC"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Reuters Group plc"></category><category term="U.S. House Budget Committee"></category><category term="Paul Ryan"></category></entry><entry><title>U.S. deficit deal could head off debt-limit fight</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/deficit-deal-head-debtlimit-fight-4771075a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2011-04-21T15:30:16Z</updated><author><name>Reuters US Online Report Politics News</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2011-04-21:/tax-policy/deficit-deal-head-debtlimit-fight-4771075a/</id><summary type="html">&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;WASHINGTON&lt;/span&gt; (&lt;span&gt;&lt;a title="Reuters Group plc" href="/topic/Reuters+Group+plc" &gt;Reuters&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;) - As &lt;a title="Washington, DC" href="/topic/Washington%2c+DC" &gt;Washington&lt;/a&gt; gears up for a fight over the debt ceiling, lawmakers are considering an approach that would allow them to say they are adopting fiscal discipline over the long term even as they vote for increased borrowing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The approach, outlined in several proposals circulating on &lt;span&gt;&lt;a title="Capitol Hil...</summary><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Political Lobbyists"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="The White House"></category><category term="Washington, DC"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Capitol Hill"></category><category term="Reuters Group plc"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="Eric Cantor"></category><category term="U.S. House Budget Committee"></category><category term="Chris Van Hollen"></category><category term="Bipartisan Policy Center"></category><category term="Thomas Ferraro"></category><category term="Todd Eastham"></category><category term="National Debt"></category></entry><entry><title>Instant View: Obama lays out 'vision' for curing fiscal woes</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/instant-view-obama-lays-vision-curing-fiscal-woes-4767318a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2011-04-13T12:30:25Z</updated><author><name>Reuters US Online Report Top News</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2011-04-13:/tax-policy/instant-view-obama-lays-vision-curing-fiscal-woes-4767318a/</id><summary type="html">&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;WASHINGTON&lt;/span&gt; (&lt;span&gt;&lt;a title="Reuters Group plc" href="/topic/Reuters+Group+plc" &gt;Reuters&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;) - &lt;span&gt;&lt;a title="Barack Obama" href="/topic/Barack+Obama" &gt;President Barack Obama&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; on Wednesday laid out his long-term strategy to reduce the &lt;span&gt;U.S.&lt;/span&gt; budget deficit by $4 trillion over 12 years.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;He proposed four steps to achieving balance: savings on the defense budget, elimination of waste in healthcare spending, control of domestic expenditures and...</summary><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="Medicaid"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Chicago"></category><category term="Reuters Group plc"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="Planned Parenthood Federation of America"></category><category term="U.S. Republican Party"></category><category term="Norman Ornstein"></category><category term="U.S. House Budget Committee"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="Joe Biden"></category></entry><entry><title>Public prefers cutting defense spending: Reuters/Ipsos poll</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/public-prefers-cutting-defense-spending-reutersipsos-poll-4751879a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2011-03-09T12:00:21Z</updated><author><name>Reuters US Online Report Politics News</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2011-03-09:/tax-policy/public-prefers-cutting-defense-spending-reutersipsos-poll-4751879a/</id><summary type="html">&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;WASHINGTON&lt;/span&gt; (&lt;a title="Reuters Group plc" href="/topic/Reuters+Group+plc" &gt;Reuters&lt;/a&gt;) - A majority of Americans prefer cutting defense spending to reduce the federal deficit rather than taking money from public retirement and health programs, a Reuters/&lt;a title="Ipsos Group" href="/topic/Ipsos+Group" &gt;Ipsos&lt;/a&gt; poll released on Wednesday showed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The poll found 51 percent of Americans support reducing defense spending, and only 28 percent want to cut &lt;span id="medicare...</summary><category term="Armed Forces"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Military and Defense Policy"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Federal Budget"></category><category term="Federal Deficits"></category><category term="Government Spending"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="U.S. Congress"></category><category term="Medicaid"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="U.S. House of Representatives"></category><category term="The Pentagon"></category><category term="Reuters Group plc"></category><category term="U.S. Democratic Party"></category><category term="John Whitesides"></category><category term="Ipsos Group"></category><category term="U.S. Republican Party"></category><category term="Charles Schumer"></category><category term="Eric Cantor"></category><category term="Center for American Progress"></category><category term="Steve Holland"></category><category term="Cliff Young"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="Polls and Approval Ratings"></category><category term="Social Security"></category></entry><entry><title>Deficit panel split; painful package in doubt</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/deficit-panel-split-painful-package-doubt-4703924a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-12-01T15:00:51Z</updated><author><name>AP Features</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-12-01:/tax-policy/deficit-panel-split-painful-package-doubt-4703924a/</id><summary type="html">&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;A painful package of spending cuts and tax increases drew sharp challenges from both the left and right on &lt;span&gt;&lt;a title="Barack Obama" href="/topic/Barack+Obama" &gt;President Barack Obama&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;'s deficit commission Wednesday, putting approval in doubt. However, both parties' Senate budget point men embraced the plan, and even opponents called it a starting point for efforts next year to control the nation's ballooning debt.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"It's a template that gives people an opportunity to ...</summary><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="U.S. Politics"></category><category term="World Politics"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Federal Budget"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="U.S. Congressional Politics"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="The White House"></category><category term="Oklahoma"></category><category term="Medicaid"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Bill Clinton"></category><category term="Illinois"></category><category term="New Hampshire"></category><category term="California"></category><category term="Idaho"></category><category term="Wyoming"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="U.S. Democratic Party"></category><category term="Timothy Geithner"></category><category term="U.S. Republican Party"></category><category term="Robert Gibbs"></category><category term="U.S. House Budget Committee"></category><category term="Xavier Becerra"></category><category term="Kent Conrad"></category><category term="Judd Gregg"></category><category term="John Spratt"></category><category term="Jacob Lew"></category><category term="Jeb Hensarling"></category><category term="U.S. Senate Budget Committee"></category><category term="Tom Coburn"></category><category term="Alan Simpson"></category><category term="Paul Ryan"></category><category term="Mike Crapo"></category><category term="Alice Rivlin"></category><category term="Erskine Bowles"></category><category term="Jan Schakowsky"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform"></category></entry><entry><title>AP-CNBC Poll: Cut services to balance the budget</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/apcnbc-poll-cut-services-balance-budget-4627846a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-11-30T01:00:17Z</updated><author><name>AP News</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-11-30:/tax-policy/apcnbc-poll-cut-services-balance-budget-4627846a/</id><summary type="html">&lt;div id="subtitle"&gt;AP-&lt;a title="CNBC Inc." href="/topic/CNBC+Inc." &gt;CNBC&lt;/a&gt; Poll: Service cuts a favored path for balancing budget, but little consensus on where&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;To ease surging budget deficits, Americans prefer cutting federal services to raising taxes by nearly 2-1 in a new poll. Yet there is little consensus on specific, meaningful steps &amp;#8212; and a wariness about touching two gargantuan programs, Social Security and &lt;span id="medicare" class="inform"&gt;&lt;a title="Medicare" href=...</summary><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="Social Issues"></category><category term="Aging and the Elderly"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="The Associated Press"></category><category term="U.S. Democratic Party"></category><category term="CNBC Inc."></category><category term="Ashburn (Virginia)"></category><category term="GfK Group"></category><category term="U.S. Republican Party"></category><category term="Roseville"></category><category term="Trevor Tompson"></category><category term="Pawleys Island"></category><category term="Mark Price"></category></entry><entry><title>Full agenda as Congress tries to finish for year</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/full-agenda-congress-finish-year-4390662a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-11-28T05:30:25Z</updated><author><name>AP News</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-11-28:/tax-policy/full-agenda-congress-finish-year-4390662a/</id><summary type="html">&lt;div id="subtitle"&gt;So little time, so much to do as Congress heads into final stretch&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;The unemployed and millionaires. Doctors and black farmers. Illegal immigrants hiding from the law and gays hiding in the military. Along with just about everybody else, they all have something at stake as Congress struggles to wrap up its work for the year.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lawmakers, after taking &lt;span id="thanksgiving" class="inform"&gt;Thanksgiving&lt;/span&gt; week off, arrive in town Monday along with the Capito...</summary><category term="Jobs and Labor"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Federal Budget"></category><category term="Government Spending"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="George W. Bush"></category><category term="The White House"></category><category term="Harry Reid"></category><category term="Mitch McConnell"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Arizona"></category><category term="Europe"></category><category term="Food and Drug Administration"></category><category term="The Pentagon"></category><category term="Russia"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="U.S. Democratic Party"></category><category term="Michelle Obama"></category><category term="U.S. Republican Party"></category><category term="Jon Kyl"></category><category term="Don't Ask, Don't Tell"></category><category term="Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty"></category><category term="Unemployment Insurance"></category></entry><entry><title>Time To Redefine Gov't To Social Reality</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/time-redefine-govt-social-reality-4430650a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-11-29T14:45:24Z</updated><author><name>Investors Business Daily</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-11-29:/tax-policy/time-redefine-govt-social-reality-4430650a/</id><summary type="html">...</summary><category term="Economies"></category><category term="Economic Issues"></category><category term="Economic Development"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Federal Budget"></category><category term="Government Spending"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="Social Issues"></category><category term="Aging and the Elderly"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="George W. Bush"></category><category term="Medicaid"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Bill Clinton"></category><category term="The Pentagon"></category><category term="U.S. Congressional Budget Office"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="U.S. Democratic Party"></category><category term="Jimmy Carter"></category><category term="Amtrak"></category><category term="U.S. Republican Party"></category><category term="Alan Simpson"></category><category term="Erskine Bowles"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform"></category><category term="U.S. Liberal Politics"></category></entry><entry><title>Obama State of the Union</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/economic-stimulus/obama-state-union-4697572a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-11-30T13:54:41Z</updated><author><name>Mahalo</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-11-30:/economic-stimulus/obama-state-union-4697572a/</id><summary type="html">...</summary><category term="Economic Indicators"></category><category term="Labor Market"></category><category term="Job Growth"></category><category term="Financial Markets"></category><category term="Economies"></category><category term="Personal Finance"></category><category term="Small Business"></category><category term="Economic Issues"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Federal Budget"></category><category term="Recessions and Depressions"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="Technology"></category><category term="Energy Technology"></category><category term="Alternative Energy"></category><category term="Economic Crisis"></category><category term="Afghanistan"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="The White House"></category><category term="Ohio"></category><category term="Eliot Engel"></category><category term="Virginia"></category><category term="Medicaid"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Florida"></category><category term="North Carolina"></category><category term="Louisiana"></category><category term="China"></category><category term="Iraq"></category><category term="U.S. Supreme Court"></category><category term="Ronald Reagan"></category><category term="Wall Street"></category><category term="Illinois"></category><category term="California"></category><category term="Philadelphia"></category><category term="United Kingdom"></category><category term="Europe"></category><category term="Massachusetts"></category><category term="Africa"></category><category term="Colombia"></category><category term="Asia"></category><category term="South America"></category><category term="Middle East"></category><category term="Caribbean"></category><category term="Phoenix (Arizona)"></category><category term="Western Europe"></category><category term="Russia"></category><category term="Tampa"></category><category term="Guinea"></category><category term="George Washington"></category><category term="Allentown (Pennsylvania)"></category><category term="Panama"></category><category term="Central America"></category><category term="South Korea"></category><category term="Detroit"></category><category term="U.S. Congressional Budget Office"></category><category term="Thomas Jefferson"></category><category term="Iran"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="Twitter Inc."></category><category term="Facebook Inc."></category><category term="East Asia"></category><category term="South Asia"></category><category term="U.S. Democratic Party"></category><category term="West Africa"></category><category term="John F. Kennedy"></category><category term="Woodrow Wilson"></category><category term="Economic Stimulus"></category><category term="North Korea"></category><category term="Haiti"></category><category term="Elkhart (Indiana)"></category><category term="Qatar"></category><category term="Michelle Obama"></category><category term="Al Qaeda"></category><category term="U.S. Republican Party"></category><category term="Doha"></category><category term="Bob McDonnell"></category><category term="SportsCenter"></category><category term="Kent Conrad"></category><category term="Judd Gregg"></category><category term="Omaha Beach"></category><category term="Jill Biden"></category><category term="Arabian Peninsula"></category><category term="American Recovery and Reinvestment Act"></category><category term="Elyria"></category><category term="Bull Run Corporation"></category><category term="Galesburg"></category><category term="England"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="Insurance"></category><category term="Joe Biden"></category><category term="Health Insurance"></category><category term="London (England)"></category><category term="Don't Ask, Don't Tell"></category><category term="COBRA Continuation Health Coverage"></category><category term="Scott Brown (Politician)"></category><category term="Elementary and Secondary Education Act"></category><category term="Pell Grants"></category><category term="John Adams (President)"></category><category term="Fiscal Commission"></category><category term="Group of Twenty"></category><category term="State of the Union Address"></category><category term="Election Day"></category><category term="Lagging Economic Indicators"></category><category term="Al Qaedas"></category></entry><entry><title>Analysis: Deficit panel pushes Dems, GOP</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/analysis-deficit-panel-pushes-dems-gop-4379477a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-11-12T13:30:32Z</updated><author><name>AP News</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-11-12:/tax-policy/analysis-deficit-panel-pushes-dems-gop-4379477a/</id><summary type="html">&lt;div id="subtitle"&gt;Analysis: Deficit panel pushes GOP, Dems, to accept higher taxes, spending cuts to curb debt&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;The leaders of the deficit commission are baldly calling out the budget myths of both political parties, challenging lawmakers to engage in the "adult conversation" they say they want.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Their plan &amp;#8212; mixing painful cuts to Social Security and &lt;span id="medicare" class="inform"&gt;&lt;a title="Medicare" href="/topic/Medicare" &gt;Medicare&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; with big tax increases ...</summary><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="George W. Bush"></category><category term="The White House"></category><category term="John Boehner"></category><category term="Nancy Pelosi"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Ronald Reagan"></category><category term="Wyoming"></category><category term="The Pentagon"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="Alan Greenspan"></category><category term="The Associated Press"></category><category term="U.S. Democratic Party"></category><category term="NBC Universal Inc."></category><category term="Glenn Beck"></category><category term="Rachel Maddow"></category><category term="U.S. Republican Party"></category><category term="Meet the Press"></category><category term="Andrew Taylor"></category><category term="Center on Budget and Policy Priorities"></category><category term="Kent Conrad"></category><category term="Judd Gregg"></category><category term="Jim DeMint"></category><category term="Alan Simpson"></category><category term="Bill Burton"></category><category term="Erskine Bowles"></category><category term="Tom Davis"></category><category term="Thomas O'Neill"></category><category term="Pledge to America"></category></entry><entry><title>Why the US needs an austerity budget</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/economic-stimulus/austerity-budget-4563690a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-11-29T15:43:18Z</updated><author><name>Helium</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-11-29:/economic-stimulus/austerity-budget-4563690a/</id><summary type="html">...</summary><category term="Economic Indicators"></category><category term="Economies"></category><category term="Economic Issues"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Health Care Policy"></category><category term="World Politics"></category><category term="European Politics"></category><category term="British Politics"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Federal Budget"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="Economic Crisis"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="Washington, DC"></category><category term="Nancy Pelosi"></category><category term="Medicaid"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Connecticut"></category><category term="United Kingdom"></category><category term="Europe"></category><category term="Western Europe"></category><category term="Greece"></category><category term="The Balkans"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="U.S. Democratic Party"></category><category term="Economic Stimulus"></category><category term="U.S. Republican Party"></category><category term="Liberal Democrats (UK)"></category><category term="Paul Ryan"></category><category term="Conservative Party (UK)"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category></entry><entry><title>2010 election campaign tactics by republicans and democrats</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/2010-election-campaign-tactics-republicans-democrats-4611181a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-11-29T16:03:50Z</updated><author><name>Helium</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-11-29:/tax-policy/2010-election-campaign-tactics-republicans-democrats-4611181a/</id><summary type="html">...</summary><category term="Entertainment"></category><category term="Media"></category><category term="Television"></category><category term="TV News Shows"></category><category term="Financial Markets"></category><category term="Personal Finance"></category><category term="Small Business"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Election Campaigns"></category><category term="Political Parties"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="U.S. Politics"></category><category term="World Politics"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="U.S. Congressional Politics"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="George W. Bush"></category><category term="The White House"></category><category term="Washington, DC"></category><category term="U.S. Congress"></category><category term="Virginia"></category><category term="Gulf of Mexico"></category><category term="Medicaid"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Bill Clinton"></category><category term="Wall Street"></category><category term="U.S. House of Representatives"></category><category term="California"></category><category term="Goldman Sachs Group Inc."></category><category term="BP plc"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="The Washington Post Company"></category><category term="U.S. Democratic Party"></category><category term="Jack Nicholson"></category><category term="FOX News Network LLC"></category><category term="Sarah Palin"></category><category term="Good Morning America"></category><category term="Rachel Maddow"></category><category term="U.S. Republican Party"></category><category term="National Review Inc."></category><category term="U.S. Senate Budget Committee"></category><category term="San Bruno"></category><category term="Paul Ryan"></category><category term="Bechtel Corporation"></category><category term="Big Brother (TV Show)"></category><category term="Media Matters for America"></category><category term="David Frum"></category><category term="Leonard Downie Jr."></category><category term="Anita Dunn"></category><category term="Michael Clemente"></category><category term="Doug Elmendorf"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="Insurance"></category><category term="Health Insurance"></category><category term="Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act"></category><category term="Fossil Fuel Energy Production"></category><category term="A Few Good Men"></category><category term="U.S. Conservative Politics"></category><category term="Pledge to America"></category></entry><entry><title>White House Open To Lame-Duck Deal To Renew Tax Cuts</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/white-house-open-lameduck-deal-renew-tax-cuts-4428066a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-11-29T14:44:24Z</updated><author><name>Investors Business Daily</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-11-29:/tax-policy/white-house-open-lameduck-deal-renew-tax-cuts-4428066a/</id><summary type="html">...</summary><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Parties"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Social Policy"></category><category term="Health Care Policy"></category><category term="U.S. Politics"></category><category term="World Politics"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="Income Taxes"></category><category term="U.S. Congressional Politics"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="The White House"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="U.S. Democratic Party"></category><category term="Strategas Research Partners"></category><category term="U.S. Republican Party"></category><category term="Robert Gibbs"></category><category term="Daniel Clifton"></category><category term="Greg Valliere"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="U.S. Liberal Politics"></category></entry><entry><title>Look At The Real Numbers, The Recession Never Ended</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/real-numbers-recession-ended-4418248a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-11-29T14:40:11Z</updated><author><name>Forbes</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-11-29:/tax-policy/real-numbers-recession-ended-4418248a/</id><summary type="html">...</summary><category term="Economic Indicators"></category><category term="Labor Market"></category><category term="Job Growth"></category><category term="Jobs and Labor"></category><category term="Economies"></category><category term="Personal Finance"></category><category term="Economic Issues"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Recessions and Depressions"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="Economic Crisis"></category><category term="Afghanistan"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="U.S. Congress"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Iraq"></category><category term="Europe"></category><category term="France"></category><category term="Middle East"></category><category term="Western Europe"></category><category term="Greece"></category><category term="The Balkans"></category><category term="Apple Inc."></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="U.S. Democratic Party"></category><category term="Gary Shilling"></category><category term="Suze Orman"></category><category term="David Rosenberg"></category><category term="Jean Monnet"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="Apple iPad"></category><category term="Unemployment Insurance"></category><category term="Coincident Economic Indicators"></category><category term="Gross Domestic Product"></category><category term="Lagging Economic Indicators"></category></entry><entry><title>Is an Obamaville in Your Future?</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/economic-stimulus/obamaville-future-4277489a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-11-05T07:04:18Z</updated><author><name>Big Think</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-11-05:/economic-stimulus/obamaville-future-4277489a/</id><summary type="html">...</summary><category term="Economies"></category><category term="U.S. Economy"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="U.S. Politics"></category><category term="World Politics"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Federal Budget"></category><category term="Government Spending"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="AARP"></category><category term="U.S. Congressional Budget Office"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="U.S. Democratic Party"></category><category term="Economic Stimulus"></category><category term="Greg Sargent"></category><category term="Gerald Connolly"></category><category term="American Recovery and Reinvestment Act"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="60 Plus Association"></category><category term="Philip Klein"></category></entry><entry><title>Reflections:  Trusting our medical care to government bureaucracy</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/reflections-trusting-medical-care-government-bureaucracy-4185410a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-11-04T14:01:38Z</updated><author><name>Helium</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-11-04:/tax-policy/reflections-trusting-medical-care-government-bureaucracy-4185410a/</id><summary type="html">...</summary><category term="Personal Finance"></category><category term="Armed Forces"></category><category term="Veterans' Affairs"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="Washington, DC"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Thomas Jefferson"></category><category term="Kiefer Sutherland"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="Insurance"></category><category term="Health Insurance"></category></entry><entry><title>Lessons Not Learned</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/economic-stimulus/lessons-learned-4032359a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-11-03T03:20:41Z</updated><author><name>hubPage</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-11-03:/economic-stimulus/lessons-learned-4032359a/</id><summary type="html">...</summary><category term="Economic Indicators"></category><category term="Labor Market"></category><category term="Job Growth"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="Wal-Mart Stores Inc."></category><category term="Economic Stimulus"></category><category term="Works Progress Administration"></category><category term="Pancho Villa"></category><category term="Pancho Villapredicted"></category></entry><entry><title>Pledging Our Way To Fiscal Disaster</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/pledging-fiscal-disaster-3507858a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-11-02T12:29:11Z</updated><author><name>Forbes</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-11-02:/tax-policy/pledging-fiscal-disaster-3507858a/</id><summary type="html">...</summary><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Africa"></category><category term="Houston (Texas)"></category><category term="Egypt"></category><category term="USA TODAY"></category><category term="The Gallup Organization"></category><category term="North Africa"></category><category term="U.S. Democratic Party"></category><category term="U.S. Republican Party"></category><category term="Americans for Tax Reform"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="Progressive Change Campaign Committee"></category><category term="Polls and Approval Ratings"></category><category term="Pledge to America"></category></entry><entry><title>When Will Republicans Quit Contradicting Themselves?</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/economic-stimulus/republicans-quit-contradicting-3625402a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-11-02T14:48:26Z</updated><author><name>Big Think</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-11-02:/economic-stimulus/republicans-quit-contradicting-3625402a/</id><summary type="html">...</summary><category term="Media"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Parties"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="U.S. Politics"></category><category term="World Politics"></category><category term="Social Issues"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Guantanamo Bay"></category><category term="National Basketball Association"></category><category term="Economic Stimulus"></category><category term="U.S. Republican Party"></category><category term="Rush Limbaugh"></category><category term="Sean Hannity"></category><category term="Jack Conway"></category><category term="Joe Miller"></category><category term="Rand Paul"></category><category term="U.S. Conservative Politics"></category><category term="Russell King"></category></entry><entry><title>A productive Congress gets no respect from voters</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/economic-stimulus/productive-congress-respect-voters-2131569a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-10-18T01:00:30Z</updated><author><name>AP Features</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-10-18:/economic-stimulus/productive-congress-respect-voters-2131569a/</id><summary type="html">&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;The public panned it. Republicans obstructed it. Many Democrats fled from it. Even so, the session of Congress now drawing to a close was the most productive in nearly half a century.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not since the explosive years of the civil rights movement and the hard-fought debut of government-supported health care for the elderly and poor have so many big things &amp;#8212; love them or hate them &amp;#8212; been done so quickly.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Gridlock? It may feel that way. But that's not the story of the 1...</summary><category term="Law"></category><category term="Constitutional Law"></category><category term="Civil Rights"></category><category term="Economic Issues"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="Economic Crisis"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="Washington, DC"></category><category term="Medicaid"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Wall Street"></category><category term="Asia"></category><category term="Vietnam"></category><category term="Dartmouth College"></category><category term="Southeast Asia"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="Franklin D. Roosevelt"></category><category term="Theodore Roosevelt"></category><category term="U.S. Democratic Party"></category><category term="Economic Stimulus"></category><category term="U.S. Republican Party"></category><category term="Steny Hoyer"></category><category term="American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research"></category><category term="Norman Ornstein"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="Car Allowance Rebate System"></category></entry><entry><title>ADWATCH: With campaign ads, don't trust, verify</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/economic-stimulus/adwatch-campaign-ads-dont-trust-verify-1972963a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-10-15T01:30:48Z</updated><author><name>AP News</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-10-15:/economic-stimulus/adwatch-campaign-ads-dont-trust-verify-1972963a/</id><summary type="html">&lt;div id="subtitle"&gt;ADWATCH: On taxes, jobs, campaign ads spin fanciful fiction from mere nuggets of truth&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;Finding an actual fact in this season's load of campaign ads is like panning for nuggets. There's a lot of fool's gold in the way.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this warped-lens world, a Democrat who votes against his party more than every other legislator except one is branded a lapdog of his party's leadership. A federal deficit from the past is attributed to a health care law that did not yet exi...</summary><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Election Campaigns"></category><category term="Political Parties"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="U.S. Politics"></category><category term="World Politics"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="U.S. Congressional Politics"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="Washington, DC"></category><category term="Nancy Pelosi"></category><category term="North America"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="North Carolina"></category><category term="Texas"></category><category term="China"></category><category term="Wisconsin"></category><category term="Idaho"></category><category term="Mexico"></category><category term="Asia"></category><category term="Maryland"></category><category term="Social Security Administration"></category><category term="U.S. Congressional Budget Office"></category><category term="U.S. Chamber of Commerce"></category><category term="The Associated Press"></category><category term="East Asia"></category><category term="The Washington Post Company"></category><category term="U.S. Democratic Party"></category><category term="Ron Paul"></category><category term="Economic Stimulus"></category><category term="U.S. Republican Party"></category><category term="Americans for Tax Reform"></category><category term="Bobby N. Bright"></category><category term="Karl Rove"></category><category term="Paul Ryan"></category><category term="Frank Kratovil"></category><category term="Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee"></category><category term="National Republican Congressional Committee"></category><category term="Walt Minnick"></category><category term="Harold Johnson"></category><category term="Steve Kagen"></category><category term="Ben Chandler"></category><category term="Medicare Advantage Plan"></category><category term="U.S. Conservative Politics"></category><category term="American Crossroads"></category><category term="John Kartch"></category></entry><entry><title>With campaign ads, don't trust, verify</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/economic-stimulus/campaign-ads-dont-trust-verify-3506603a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-11-02T12:28:04Z</updated><author><name>Forbes</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-11-02:/economic-stimulus/campaign-ads-dont-trust-verify-3506603a/</id><summary type="html">...</summary><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Elections and Voting"></category><category term="Election Campaigns"></category><category term="Political Parties"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="U.S. Politics"></category><category term="World Politics"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Federal Budget"></category><category term="Social Services Funding"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="U.S. Congressional Politics"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="Ohio"></category><category term="Kentucky"></category><category term="Washington, DC"></category><category term="Nancy Pelosi"></category><category term="North America"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="North Carolina"></category><category term="Texas"></category><category term="China"></category><category term="Indiana"></category><category term="Michigan"></category><category term="Wisconsin"></category><category term="Idaho"></category><category term="Mexico"></category><category term="Asia"></category><category term="Maryland"></category><category term="Social Security Administration"></category><category term="U.S. Congressional Budget Office"></category><category term="U.S. Chamber of Commerce"></category><category term="East Asia"></category><category term="The Washington Post Company"></category><category term="U.S. Democratic Party"></category><category term="Ron Paul"></category><category term="Economic Stimulus"></category><category term="U.S. Republican Party"></category><category term="Michael Bennet"></category><category term="Americans for Tax Reform"></category><category term="Bobby N. Bright"></category><category term="Karl Rove"></category><category term="Paul Ryan"></category><category term="Frank Kratovil"></category><category term="Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee"></category><category term="National Republican Congressional Committee"></category><category term="Walt Minnick"></category><category term="Harold Johnson"></category><category term="Steve Kagen"></category><category term="Ben Chandler"></category><category term="Andy Barr"></category><category term="Jim Renacci"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="Medicare Advantage Plan"></category><category term="Sean Duffy"></category><category term="Alan Nunnelee"></category><category term="U.S. Liberal Politics"></category><category term="U.S. Conservative Politics"></category><category term="American Crossroads"></category><category term="Jackie Walorski"></category><category term="John Kartch"></category></entry><entry><title>How Do You Feel About the Head of the IRS being Someone Who Hasn't Paid His Taxes?</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/feel-head-irs-hasnt-paid-taxes-3938156a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-11-03T00:01:17Z</updated><author><name>hubPage</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-11-03:/tax-policy/feel-head-irs-hasnt-paid-taxes-3938156a/</id><summary type="html">...</summary><category term="Law"></category><category term="Tax Law"></category><category term="Economic Issues"></category><category term="Economic Development"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="U.S. Politics"></category><category term="World Politics"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="Income Taxes"></category><category term="Technology"></category><category term="Computer Technology"></category><category term="Software"></category><category term="Financial Software"></category><category term="Tax Software"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="The New York Times Company"></category><category term="Washington, DC"></category><category term="U.S. Congress"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="China"></category><category term="Bill Clinton"></category><category term="U.S. Department of the Treasury"></category><category term="Wall Street"></category><category term="U.S. Federal Reserve"></category><category term="Goldman Sachs Group Inc."></category><category term="Internal Revenue Service"></category><category term="Federal Reserve Bank of New York"></category><category term="Arizona"></category><category term="United Kingdom"></category><category term="Nigeria"></category><category term="Europe"></category><category term="Africa"></category><category term="The Wall Street Journal"></category><category term="Asia"></category><category term="Tucson"></category><category term="Western Europe"></category><category term="West Virginia"></category><category term="Robert Kiyosaki"></category><category term="Hillary Clinton"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="Adolf Hitler"></category><category term="East Asia"></category><category term="U.S. Democratic Party"></category><category term="West Africa"></category><category term="Timothy Geithner"></category><category term="International Monetary Fund"></category><category term="Intuit TurboTax"></category><category term="Caroline Kennedy"></category><category term="The Rolling Stones"></category><category term="Max Baucus"></category><category term="Harry Byrd"></category><category term="Wheeling (West Virginia)"></category><category term="U.S. Dollar"></category><category term="Group of Twenty"></category><category term="Income Tax Preparation"></category><category term="Anne Ryand"></category><category term="York City Federal Reserve Bank"></category></entry><entry><title>How Tax Cuts Work</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/tax-cuts-work-3752246a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-11-02T18:28:19Z</updated><author><name>hubPage</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-11-02:/tax-policy/tax-cuts-work-3752246a/</id><summary type="html">...</summary><category term="Personal Finance"></category><category term="Financial Planning"></category><category term="Retirement Planning"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Federal Budget"></category><category term="Social Services Funding"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="George W. Bush"></category><category term="Financial Times Ltd."></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="U.S. Supreme Court"></category><category term="Ronald Reagan"></category><category term="U.S. Department of the Treasury"></category><category term="Europe"></category><category term="Enron Corporation"></category><category term="Western Europe"></category><category term="Social Security Administration"></category><category term="Franklin D. Roosevelt"></category><category term="Dwight D. Eisenhower"></category><category term="Hans Christian Andersen"></category><category term="U.S. Democratic Party"></category><category term="Paul Krugman"></category><category term="Paul O'Neill"></category><category term="Sam Rayburn"></category><category term="U.S. Republican Party"></category><category term="Grover Norquist"></category><category term="John Kenneth Galbraith"></category><category term="England"></category><category term="Frederich Hayek"></category><category term="The New Deal"></category><category term="401(k)s"></category><category term="Social Security Act"></category><category term="FASAB"></category><category term="Arthur Flemming"></category></entry><entry><title>COMMON SENSE AMERICA</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/economic-stimulus/common-sense-america-3937820a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-11-03T00:00:31Z</updated><author><name>hubPage</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-11-03:/economic-stimulus/common-sense-america-3937820a/</id><summary type="html">...</summary><category term="Economic Indicators"></category><category term="Labor Market"></category><category term="Job Growth"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Social Policy"></category><category term="Health Care Policy"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="Sciences"></category><category term="Earth Science"></category><category term="Climatology"></category><category term="Global Climate Change"></category><category term="Immigration"></category><category term="Nature and the Environment"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="MTV Networks Company"></category><category term="Economic Stimulus"></category><category term="Illegal Immigration and Deportation"></category><category term="Environmental Issues and Protection"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="Oh Wayne"></category></entry><entry><title>A Post Election Challenge | An Independent Voters View</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/post-election-challenge-7C-independent-voters-view-3946602a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-11-03T00:17:31Z</updated><author><name>hubPage</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-11-03:/tax-policy/post-election-challenge-7C-independent-voters-view-3946602a/</id><summary type="html">...</summary><category term="Law"></category><category term="Tax Law"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Military and Defense Policy"></category><category term="Medicaid"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="U.S. Department of Defense"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="Warren Buffett"></category><category term="FOX News Network LLC"></category><category term="U.S. Military Health System"></category></entry><entry><title>Delos Smith: Federal Infrastructure Spending Needed</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/economic-stimulus/delos-smith-federal-infrastructure-spending-needed-3494096a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-11-02T12:15:05Z</updated><author><name>SeekingAlpha</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-11-02:/economic-stimulus/delos-smith-federal-infrastructure-spending-needed-3494096a/</id><summary type="html">...</summary><category term="Economic Indicators"></category><category term="Labor Market"></category><category term="Job Growth"></category><category term="Economies"></category><category term="U.S. Economy"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Federal Budget"></category><category term="Government Spending"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="Central Banking"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="Washington, DC"></category><category term="Medicaid"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="California"></category><category term="U.S. Federal Reserve"></category><category term="Fordham University"></category><category term="Economic Stimulus"></category><category term="U.S. Republican Party"></category><category term="Washington Monument"></category><category term="American Bus Association"></category><category term="Financial Regulatory Policy"></category><category term="The Conference Board"></category></entry><entry><title>We Can Afford Obamacare, But Not Tax Cuts?</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/afford-obamacare-tax-cuts-1555315a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-09-23T07:04:32Z</updated><author><name>Crosswalk</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-09-23:/tax-policy/afford-obamacare-tax-cuts-1555315a/</id><summary type="html">...</summary><category term="Economic Issues"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Local Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Social Policy"></category><category term="Health Care Policy"></category><category term="U.S. Politics"></category><category term="World Politics"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Recessions and Depressions"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="Economic Crisis"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="Rush Limbaugh"></category><category term="Saul Alinsky"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="Economic Recovery"></category><category term="U.S. Liberal Politics"></category></entry><entry><title>What comes after a trillion? Save some of your money from taxes, bailouts</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/trillion-save-money-taxes-bailouts-1371298a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-09-11T13:06:22Z</updated><author><name>Modern Medicine</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-09-11:/tax-policy/trillion-save-money-taxes-bailouts-1371298a/</id><summary type="html">...</summary><category term="Personal Finance"></category><category term="Financial Planning"></category><category term="Retirement Planning"></category><category term="Individual Retirement Accounts"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="Income Taxes"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="George W. Bush"></category><category term="Washington, DC"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Internal Revenue Service"></category><category term="Citigroup Inc."></category><category term="Exxon Mobil Corporation"></category><category term="General Electric Company"></category><category term="Tax Foundation"></category><category term="John Havens"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="Insurance"></category><category term="Health Insurance"></category><category term="U.S. Dollar"></category><category term="Capital Gains"></category><category term="Care Insurance"></category></entry><entry><title>Watch Your Assets</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/watch-assets-3573162a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-11-02T13:50:54Z</updated><author><name>Barron's</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-11-02:/tax-policy/watch-assets-3573162a/</id><summary type="html">...</summary><category term="Personal Finance"></category><category term="Financial Planning"></category><category term="Retirement Planning"></category><category term="Individual Retirement Accounts"></category><category term="Law"></category><category term="Tax Law"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="Income Taxes"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="George W. Bush"></category><category term="Washington, DC"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Texas"></category><category term="Columbia University"></category><category term="U.S. Department of the Treasury"></category><category term="Los Angeles"></category><category term="San Francisco"></category><category term="Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu"></category><category term="Fort Worth"></category><category term="PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="Syracuse University"></category><category term="Tax Foundation"></category><category term="U.S. Republican Party"></category><category term="Clint Stretch"></category><category term="Jennifer Ellison"></category><category term="Roberton Williams"></category><category term="Tax Policy Center"></category><category term="Mark Nash"></category><category term="Len Burman"></category><category term="Mark Robyn"></category><category term="Value-Added Tax"></category><category term="Capital Gains"></category><category term="Tom Karsten"></category><category term="Michael Graetz"></category></entry><entry><title>Nariman Behravesh: Job Growth to Match Population Growth First Half of 2011</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/nariman-behravesh-job-growth-match-population-growth-2011-3492853a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-11-02T12:12:10Z</updated><author><name>SeekingAlpha</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-11-02:/tax-policy/nariman-behravesh-job-growth-match-population-growth-2011-3492853a/</id><summary type="html">...</summary><category term="Economic Indicators"></category><category term="Labor Market"></category><category term="Job Growth"></category><category term="Economies"></category><category term="Economic Issues"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="Economic Crisis"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="Medicaid"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="China"></category><category term="U.S. Federal Reserve"></category><category term="Internal Revenue Service"></category><category term="Japan"></category><category term="United Kingdom"></category><category term="Europe"></category><category term="Asia"></category><category term="Western Europe"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="Alan Greenspan"></category><category term="East Asia"></category><category term="U.S. Democratic Party"></category><category term="Global Insight Inc."></category><category term="Economic Stimulus"></category><category term="U.S. Republican Party"></category><category term="Nariman Behravesh"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="Car Allowance Rebate System"></category></entry><entry><title>Obama touts benefits to Medicare from health law</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/obama-touts-benefits-medicare-health-law-1013712a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-08-07T03:45:03Z</updated><author><name>AP Features</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-08-07:/tax-policy/obama-touts-benefits-medicare-health-law-1013712a/</id><summary type="html">&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a title="Barack Obama" href="/topic/Barack+Obama" &gt;President Barack Obama&lt;/a&gt; says &lt;a title="Medicare" href="/topic/Medicare" &gt;Medicare&lt;/a&gt; will exist for many more years, thanks to new legislation that helped put the health care program for &lt;a title="United States" href="/topic/United+States" &gt;America&lt;/a&gt;'s seniors on stronger financial footing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Seniors already are benefiting from that new health care law, said Obama, noting that many have received $250 rebates to help buy medici...</summary><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Social Policy"></category><category term="Health Care Policy"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="George W. Bush"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Illinois"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="U.S. Republican Party"></category><category term="Peter Roskam"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category></entry><entry><title>POWER CORRUPTS; ABSOLUTE POWER CORRUPTS ABSOLUTELY</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/economic-stimulus/power-corrupts-absolute-power-corrupts-absolutely-1720369a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-10-06T10:51:24Z</updated><author><name>ArticlesBase</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-10-06:/economic-stimulus/power-corrupts-absolute-power-corrupts-absolutely-1720369a/</id><summary type="html">&lt;!-- @page { margin: 0.79in } P { margin-bottom: 0.08in } A:link { color: #0000ff } --&gt;
&lt;p&gt;POWER CORRUPTS; ABSOLUTE POWER CORRUPTS ABSOLUTELY&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lord Acton (1834?1902)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The RAT board --- this is an appropriate acronym. The Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board --- a provision included in the stimulus bill, has the job to oversee in-house watchdogs, known as inspectors general. The inspectors general job is to INDEPENDENTLY investigate allegations of wrongdoing at various feder...</summary><category term="Media"></category><category term="Jobs and Labor"></category><category term="Labor Unions"></category><category term="Personal Finance"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="U.S. Politics"></category><category term="World Politics"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="The White House"></category><category term="Washington, DC"></category><category term="John Boehner"></category><category term="North America"></category><category term="Medicaid"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="U.S. Supreme Court"></category><category term="Goldman Sachs Group Inc."></category><category term="Internal Revenue Service"></category><category term="Arizona"></category><category term="Mexico"></category><category term="Thomas Jefferson"></category><category term="John Dalberg-Acton"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="Kenya"></category><category term="U.S. Democratic Party"></category><category term="AFL-CIO"></category><category term="Economic Stimulus"></category><category term="U.S. National Labor Relations Board"></category><category term="Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now"></category><category term="Felipe Calderon"></category><category term="Eric Holder"></category><category term="American Recovery and Reinvestment Act"></category><category term="Transparency Board"></category><category term="Hillsdale College"></category><category term="Donald Berwick"></category><category term="Gerald Walpin"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="Association of American Physicians and Surgeons"></category><category term="Craig Becker"></category><category term="Insurance"></category><category term="Joe Biden"></category><category term="Health Insurance"></category><category term="Recovery.gov"></category><category term="Bob Latta"></category><category term="Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act"></category><category term="Berwick Will Control"></category><category term="Tea Party Coalition"></category></entry><entry><title>Starving The Beast Or Free Lunch?</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/starving-beast-free-lunch-3503041a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-11-02T12:24:48Z</updated><author><name>Forbes</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-11-02:/tax-policy/starving-beast-free-lunch-3503041a/</id><summary type="html">...</summary><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="U.S. Politics"></category><category term="World Politics"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Federal Budget"></category><category term="Government Spending"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="George W. Bush"></category><category term="Washington, DC"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Iraq"></category><category term="Ronald Reagan"></category><category term="Arizona"></category><category term="Middle East"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="U.S. Democratic Party"></category><category term="Cato Institute"></category><category term="U.S. Republican Party"></category><category term="Jon Kyl"></category><category term="Tax Policy Center"></category><category term="Len Burman"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category></entry><entry><title>Starving the Beast or Free Lunch?</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/starving-beast-free-lunch-3502968a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-11-02T12:24:42Z</updated><author><name>Forbes</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-11-02:/tax-policy/starving-beast-free-lunch-3502968a/</id><summary type="html">...</summary><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="U.S. Politics"></category><category term="World Politics"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Federal Budget"></category><category term="Government Spending"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="George W. Bush"></category><category term="Washington, DC"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Iraq"></category><category term="Ronald Reagan"></category><category term="Arizona"></category><category term="Middle East"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="U.S. Democratic Party"></category><category term="Cato Institute"></category><category term="U.S. Republican Party"></category><category term="Jon Kyl"></category><category term="Tax Policy Center"></category><category term="Len Burman"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category></entry><entry><title>The Politics of Risk and the Risks of Politics</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/financial-regulatory-policy/politics-risk-risks-politics-3487857a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-11-02T12:07:22Z</updated><author><name>SeekingAlpha</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-11-02:/financial-regulatory-policy/politics-risk-risks-politics-3487857a/</id><summary type="html">...</summary><category term="Financial Markets"></category><category term="Fixed Income Securities"></category><category term="Bond Markets"></category><category term="Personal Finance"></category><category term="Financial Planning"></category><category term="Personal Savings"></category><category term="Economic Issues"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="World Politics"></category><category term="Asia-Pacific Politics"></category><category term="Chinese Politics"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Economic Crisis"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="China"></category><category term="Wall Street"></category><category term="Germany"></category><category term="Japan"></category><category term="Italy"></category><category term="Europe"></category><category term="Chile"></category><category term="France"></category><category term="Asia"></category><category term="South America"></category><category term="Western Europe"></category><category term="Greece"></category><category term="The Balkans"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="East Asia"></category><category term="Financial Rescue Plans"></category><category term="Southern Europe"></category><category term="Financial Regulatory Policy"></category><category term="Government Bonds"></category><category term="Peter G. Peterson Foundation of US"></category></entry><entry><title>How Bad Is the Budget Outlook?</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/bad-budget-outlook-3487339a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-11-02T12:06:56Z</updated><author><name>SeekingAlpha</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-11-02:/tax-policy/bad-budget-outlook-3487339a/</id><summary type="html">...</summary><category term="Economies"></category><category term="U.S. Economy"></category><category term="Personal Finance"></category><category term="Financial Planning"></category><category term="Personal Budgeting"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Social Policy"></category><category term="Public Health Policy"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="U.S. Congressional Budget Office"></category><category term="Len Burman"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="Insurance"></category><category term="Health Insurance"></category><category term="Group of Twenty"></category><category term="Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center"></category><category term="Joe Rosenberg"></category><category term="Jeff Rohaly"></category><category term="Katie Lim"></category></entry><entry><title>Health Care Reform Winners</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/health-care-reform-winners-3501621a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-11-02T12:23:32Z</updated><author><name>Forbes</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-11-02:/tax-policy/health-care-reform-winners-3501621a/</id><summary type="html">...</summary><category term="Financial Markets"></category><category term="Dividends"></category><category term="Personal Finance"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="Income Taxes"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="Biotechnology Sector"></category><category term="Pharmaceuticals Sector"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="Washington, DC"></category><category term="Medicaid"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="HMS Holdings Corp."></category><category term="Centene Corporation"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="Insurance"></category><category term="Health Insurance"></category><category term="Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act"></category><category term="Capital Gains"></category><category term="Stock Markets"></category></entry><entry><title>Aid to states, the jobless faces Senate hurdles</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/economic-stimulus/aid-states-jobless-faces-senate-hurdles-964390a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-06-15T14:30:40Z</updated><author><name>AP News</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-06-15:/economic-stimulus/aid-states-jobless-faces-senate-hurdles-964390a/</id><summary type="html">&lt;div id="subtitle"&gt;Despite earlier support, aid to states, jobless and doctors' &lt;a title="Medicare" href="/topic/Medicare" &gt;Medicare&lt;/a&gt; pay faces Senate hurdles&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;A bill providing jobless benefits and tens of billions of dollars in new aid for states and Medicare payments for doctors hangs by a thread in Congress despite lingering worries of another recession without it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The measure has been months in the making, and an earlier version passed the Senate fairly easily just three...</summary><category term="Economic Indicators"></category><category term="Labor Market"></category><category term="Unemployment Rate"></category><category term="Jobs and Labor"></category><category term="Layoffs and Downsizing"></category><category term="Economic Issues"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="U.S. Politics"></category><category term="World Politics"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="U.S. Congressional Politics"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="Economic Crisis"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="The White House"></category><category term="Medicaid"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Europe"></category><category term="Capitol Hill"></category><category term="Pennsylvania"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="U.S. Democratic Party"></category><category term="Economic Stimulus"></category><category term="U.S. Republican Party"></category><category term="Dave Obey"></category><category term="U.S. House Committee on Appropriations"></category><category term="Steny Hoyer"></category><category term="Susan Collins"></category><category term="Jared Bernstein"></category><category term="George Voinovich"></category><category term="George Miller"></category><category term="John Thune"></category><category term="Edward Rendell"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category></entry><entry><title>The Big Tax Increase Facing Small Business</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/big-tax-increase-facing-small-business-3469732a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-10-27T09:01:03Z</updated><author><name>Forbes</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-10-27:/tax-policy/big-tax-increase-facing-small-business-3469732a/</id><summary type="html">...</summary><category term="Small Business"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="New York"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="North Carolina"></category><category term="U.S. Department of the Treasury"></category><category term="California"></category><category term="Goldman Sachs Group Inc."></category><category term="Internal Revenue Service"></category><category term="Utah"></category><category term="U.S. Government Accountability Office"></category><category term="Orem"></category><category term="Chuck Grassley"></category><category term="John Edwards (Politician)"></category><category term="Dean Zerbe"></category><category term="Build America Bonds"></category><category term="Memorial Day"></category></entry><entry><title>House approves pared-back tax and spending bill</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/house-approves-paredback-tax-spending-bill-947632a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-05-28T12:15:27Z</updated><author><name>AP Features</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-05-28:/tax-policy/house-approves-paredback-tax-spending-bill-947632a/</id><summary type="html">&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;The House on Friday voted to extend unemployment benefits to people mired in joblessness but cut off help with health insurance for the newly unemployed. Money to assist with health insurance was among the tens of billions of dollars trimmed from programs introduced in last year's economic stimulus bill.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The 215-204 vote to approve the measure capped a turbulent week for Democratic leaders, who were forced by party moderates and conservatives unhappy with continued deficit spending...</summary><category term="Economic Indicators"></category><category term="Labor Market"></category><category term="Unemployment Rate"></category><category term="Personal Finance"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="Washington, DC"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="U.S. Congressional Budget Office"></category><category term="NASCAR"></category><category term="Economic Stimulus"></category><category term="Louise Slaughter"></category><category term="Wally Herger"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="Insurance"></category><category term="Health Insurance"></category><category term="COBRA Continuation Health Coverage"></category><category term="Memorial Day"></category><category term="Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund"></category></entry><entry><title>House approves bill extending jobless benefits</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/house-approves-bill-extending-jobless-benefits-947548a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-05-28T11:00:40Z</updated><author><name>AP News</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-05-28:/tax-policy/house-approves-bill-extending-jobless-benefits-947548a/</id><summary type="html">&lt;div id="subtitle"&gt;House passes pared-back tax and spending bill extending benefits for long-term jobless&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;The House has adopted a measure renewing unemployment benefits for people who have been without a job for at least six months.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The jobless benefits are in a legislative grab bag blending numerous spending measures with a renewal of tax breaks as well as tax increases to help pay for it all.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Pressure from moderate &lt;a title="Blue Dog Coalition" href="/topic/Blue+Dog+Co...</summary><category term="Economic Indicators"></category><category term="Labor Market"></category><category term="Unemployment Rate"></category><category term="Jobs and Labor"></category><category term="Layoffs and Downsizing"></category><category term="Personal Finance"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="U.S. Politics"></category><category term="World Politics"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="U.S. Congressional Politics"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="Afghanistan"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="Medicaid"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Iowa"></category><category term="Middle East"></category><category term="Tom Harkin"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="U.S. Democratic Party"></category><category term="NASCAR"></category><category term="U.S. Republican Party"></category><category term="Louise Slaughter"></category><category term="Blue Dog Coalition"></category><category term="Henry Cuellar"></category><category term="Pete Session"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="Insurance"></category><category term="Health Insurance"></category><category term="COBRA Continuation Health Coverage"></category><category term="Memorial Day"></category><category term="Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund"></category></entry><entry><title>Effect of Budget Deficit: Taxes Going Up</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/effect-budget-deficit-taxes-3377011a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-10-27T06:39:46Z</updated><author><name>SeekingAlpha</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-10-27:/tax-policy/effect-budget-deficit-taxes-3377011a/</id><summary type="html">...</summary><category term="Economies"></category><category term="Law"></category><category term="Tax Law"></category><category term="History"></category><category term="World History"></category><category term="World War II"></category><category term="Economic Issues"></category><category term="Economic Development"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="Income Taxes"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="Economic Crisis"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="The White House"></category><category term="Greg Mankiw"></category><category term="Medicaid"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Europe"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="Wikimedia Foundation Inc."></category><category term="Economic Stimulus"></category><category term="Kenneth Rogoff"></category><category term="Carmen Reinhart"></category><category term="Arthur Laffer"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="Value-Added Tax"></category></entry><entry><title>Fending Off Taxes From the Health-Care Law</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/fending-taxes-healthcare-law-3420054a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-10-27T07:44:05Z</updated><author><name>Barron's</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-10-27:/tax-policy/fending-taxes-healthcare-law-3420054a/</id><summary type="html">...</summary><category term="Company Activities and Information"></category><category term="Corporate Reporting"></category><category term="Earnings and Losses"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="Washington, DC"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center"></category></entry><entry><title>Fending Off Health Taxes</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/fending-health-taxes-3420027a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-10-27T07:44:02Z</updated><author><name>Barron's</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-10-27:/tax-policy/fending-health-taxes-3420027a/</id><summary type="html">...</summary><category term="Company Activities and Information"></category><category term="Corporate Reporting"></category><category term="Earnings and Losses"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="Washington, DC"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center"></category></entry><entry><title>Is the U.S. Like Greece?</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/greece-3375222a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-10-27T06:37:22Z</updated><author><name>SeekingAlpha</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-10-27:/tax-policy/greece-3375222a/</id><summary type="html">...</summary><category term="EU Economy"></category><category term="Financial Markets"></category><category term="Fixed Income Securities"></category><category term="Bond Markets"></category><category term="Economies"></category><category term="U.S. Economy"></category><category term="Personal Finance"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Social Policy"></category><category term="Health Care Policy"></category><category term="U.S. Politics"></category><category term="World Politics"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Federal Budget"></category><category term="Federal Deficits"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="Afghanistan"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="Alabama"></category><category term="Washington, DC"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Iraq"></category><category term="Ronald Reagan"></category><category term="U.S. Department of the Treasury"></category><category term="Wisconsin"></category><category term="Germany"></category><category term="Connecticut"></category><category term="Japan"></category><category term="United Kingdom"></category><category term="Europe"></category><category term="Utah"></category><category term="Asia"></category><category term="Middle East"></category><category term="Western Europe"></category><category term="Greece"></category><category term="The Balkans"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="East Asia"></category><category term="U.S. Republican Party"></category><category term="Center on Budget and Policy Priorities"></category><category term="Robert Bennett"></category><category term="Paul Ryan"></category><category term="David Leonhardt"></category><category term="Robert Greenstein"></category><category term="Alan Krueger"></category><category term="England"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="Insurance"></category><category term="Health Insurance"></category><category term="London (England)"></category><category term="Government Bonds"></category><category term="National Debt"></category><category term="Athens (Greece)"></category><category term="Tea Party Movement"></category><category term="U.S. Conservative Politics"></category><category term="U.S. State Politics"></category><category term="Utah Politics"></category><category term="Veterans Affairs Departments"></category></entry><entry><title>Senate restores $18 billion in jobless benefits</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/economic-stimulus/senate-restores-18-billion-jobless-benefits-901209a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-06-26T03:37:05Z</updated><author><name>AP News</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-06-26:/economic-stimulus/senate-restores-18-billion-jobless-benefits-901209a/</id><summary type="html">&lt;div id="subtitle"&gt;$18 billion jobless benefits bill passes the Senate, may quickly clear the House&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;Congress is sending &lt;a title="Barack Obama" href="/topic/Barack+Obama" &gt;President Barack Obama&lt;/a&gt; an $18 billion bill to restore unemployment benefits for people who have been out of a job for months and resume full &lt;a title="Medicare" href="/topic/Medicare" &gt;Medicare&lt;/a&gt; payments to doctors threatened by a 21 percent cut.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The House cleared the bill Thursday night by a 289-112 ...</summary><category term="Economic Indicators"></category><category term="Labor Market"></category><category term="Unemployment Rate"></category><category term="Jobs and Labor"></category><category term="Personal Finance"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Parties"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="U.S. Politics"></category><category term="World Politics"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="U.S. Congressional Politics"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="Ohio"></category><category term="Washington, DC"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Iraq"></category><category term="Massachusetts"></category><category term="Middle East"></category><category term="Maine"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="U.S. Democratic Party"></category><category term="Economic Stimulus"></category><category term="U.S. Republican Party"></category><category term="Susan Collins"></category><category term="Olympia Snowe"></category><category term="Tom Coburn"></category><category term="George Voinovich"></category><category term="Jim Bunning"></category><category term="Sander Levin"></category><category term="Jim Cooper"></category><category term="Jerry Moran"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="Insurance"></category><category term="Health Insurance"></category><category term="COBRA Continuation Health Coverage"></category><category term="Scott Brown (Politician)"></category><category term="Tea Party Movement"></category><category term="U.S. Liberal Politics"></category><category term="U.S. Conservative Politics"></category></entry><entry><title>Tax Day rhetoric aside, Americans' bills are lower</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/economic-stimulus/tax-day-rhetoric-americans-bills-903491a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-04-19T15:47:34Z</updated><author><name>AP News</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-04-19:/economic-stimulus/tax-day-rhetoric-americans-bills-903491a/</id><summary type="html">&lt;div id="subtitle"&gt;Americans paying less taxes this year despite Tax Day rhetoric, increases by struggling states&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;You wouldn't know it by the Tax Day rhetoric, but Americans are paying lower taxes this year, even with increases passed by many states to balance their budgets. Don't expect it to last.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Congress cut individuals' federal taxes for this year by about $173 billion shortly after &lt;a title="Barack Obama" href="/topic/Barack+Obama" &gt;President Barack Obama&lt;/a&gt; took office...</summary><category term="Law"></category><category term="Tax Law"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Social Policy"></category><category term="Health Care Policy"></category><category term="U.S. Politics"></category><category term="World Politics"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="Income Taxes"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="George W. Bush"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Capitol Hill"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="U.S. Democratic Party"></category><category term="Economic Stimulus"></category><category term="U.S. Republican Party"></category><category term="Grover Norquist"></category><category term="Americans for Tax Reform"></category><category term="National Conference of State Legislatures"></category><category term="Orrin Hatch"></category><category term="Steve Cohen"></category><category term="Russ Carnahan"></category><category term="Health Care Reform"></category></entry><entry><title>How Will Coming Higher Taxes Impact Stock Prices?</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/coming-higher-taxes-impact-stock-prices-3179656a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-10-25T12:54:31Z</updated><author><name>SeekingAlpha</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-10-25:/tax-policy/coming-higher-taxes-impact-stock-prices-3179656a/</id><summary type="html">...</summary><category term="Financial Markets"></category><category term="Fixed Income Securities"></category><category term="Bond Markets"></category><category term="Stock Prices"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="Income Taxes"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="Central Banking"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Ronald Reagan"></category><category term="Wall Street"></category><category term="Beverly Hills (California)"></category><category term="U.S. Federal Reserve"></category><category term="Mount Everest"></category><category term="Paul Volcker"></category><category term="T. Boone Pickens"></category><category term="David Kelly"></category><category term="Carl Icahn"></category><category term="Ronald Perelman"></category><category term="Drexel Burnham Lambert Group Inc."></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co."></category><category term="Capital Gains"></category><category term="Evan Simonoff"></category></entry><entry><title>Looking Hard For Health Care Reform Winners</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/hard-health-care-reform-winners-3180688a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-10-25T12:55:23Z</updated><author><name>Forbes</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-10-25:/tax-policy/hard-health-care-reform-winners-3180688a/</id><summary type="html">...</summary><category term="Financial Markets"></category><category term="Dividends"></category><category term="Personal Finance"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="Income Taxes"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="Biotechnology Sector"></category><category term="Pharmaceuticals Sector"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="Washington, DC"></category><category term="Medicaid"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="HMS Holdings Corp."></category><category term="Centene Corporation"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="Insurance"></category><category term="Health Insurance"></category><category term="Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act"></category><category term="Capital Gains"></category><category term="Stock Markets"></category></entry><entry><title>Health-Care Law No Palliative for Portfolios</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/healthcare-law-palliative-portfolios-3419020a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-10-27T07:42:44Z</updated><author><name>Barron's</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-10-27:/tax-policy/healthcare-law-palliative-portfolios-3419020a/</id><summary type="html">...</summary><category term="Financial Markets"></category><category term="Fixed Income Securities"></category><category term="Bond Markets"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Social Policy"></category><category term="Health Care Policy"></category><category term="U.S. Politics"></category><category term="World Politics"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="Income Taxes"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="Investment Services"></category><category term="Real Estate Investment Trusts"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="New York"></category><category term="Medicaid"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Wall Street"></category><category term="Dallas"></category><category term="Standard &amp; Poor's"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="David Kelly"></category><category term="Bespoke Investment Group LLC"></category><category term="Robert Willens"></category><category term="John Mauldin"></category><category term="Millennium Wave Advisors LLC"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="Health Care Reform"></category><category term="Government Bonds"></category><category term="Municipal Bonds"></category><category term="JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co."></category><category term="Capital Gains"></category></entry><entry><title>Most Americans: "Tax the rich but not me"</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/americans-tax-rich-888638a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-03-29T10:30:22Z</updated><author><name>Reuters Life! Online Report</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-03-29:/tax-policy/americans-tax-rich-888638a/</id><summary type="html">&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;WASHINGTON (&lt;a title="Reuters Group plc" href="/topic/Reuters+Group+plc" &gt;Reuters&lt;/a&gt;) - Most Americans believe tax hikes are OK if you're making more than $250,000, a policy proposed by &lt;a title="Barack Obama" href="/topic/Barack+Obama" &gt;President Barack Obama&lt;/a&gt;, but hands off &lt;a title="Medicare" href="/topic/Medicare" &gt;Medicare&lt;/a&gt; and Social Security, a poll released on Monday found.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a title="Quinnipiac University" href="/topic/Quinnipiac+University" &gt;Quinnipiac Universit...</summary><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="U.S. Politics"></category><category term="World Politics"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Federal Budget"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Reuters Group plc"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="U.S. Democratic Party"></category><category term="U.S. Republican Party"></category><category term="Quinnipiac University"></category><category term="Peter Brown"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="Polls and Approval Ratings"></category></entry><entry><title>Healthcare bill could be a silent killer of Americans</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/healthcare-bill-silent-killer-americans-888089a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-03-28T19:15:07Z</updated><author><name>Stockhouse</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-03-28:/tax-policy/healthcare-bill-silent-killer-americans-888089a/</id><summary type="html">&lt;div id="subtitle"&gt;More incentive on the part of the government to have inflation&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;Like many of you, the passage of the healthcare bill wasn’t met with the popping of champagne in my house. I found myself chanting “Uncle Sam, Uncle Sham” as the day wore on. Higher taxes and other major changes are headed our way. And yet, I think there’s something in the bill that’s even more dastardly.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you’re a supporter of the bill, you’d point to its benefits: Poor adults will get &lt;a tit...</summary><category term="Personal Finance"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="Medicaid"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Internal Revenue Service"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="Ayn Rand"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="Insurance"></category><category term="Health Insurance"></category><category term="Medicare Advantage Plan"></category></entry><entry><title>Falling Bonds Drag Stocks Down, Too</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/falling-bonds-drag-stocks-3418973a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-10-27T07:42:42Z</updated><author><name>Barron's</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-10-27:/tax-policy/falling-bonds-drag-stocks-3418973a/</id><summary type="html">...</summary><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="Income Taxes"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="Electronics Sector"></category><category term="Semiconductor Manufacturing"></category><category term="Communications Semiconductor Manufacturing"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Starbucks Corporation"></category><category term="Best Buy Co. Inc."></category><category term="AT&amp;T Inc."></category><category term="QUALCOMM Inc."></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="Capital Gains"></category></entry><entry><title>Here Is How the Health Care Tax Would Affect Individual High Income Tax Earnings</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/health-care-tax-affect-individual-high-income-tax-earnings-3166163a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-10-25T12:29:38Z</updated><author><name>About.com</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-10-25:/tax-policy/health-care-tax-affect-individual-high-income-tax-earnings-3166163a/</id><summary type="html">...</summary><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Tax Foundation"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category></entry><entry><title>Health care bill extends wage tax to investments</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/health-care-bill-extends-wage-tax-investments-879177a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-03-19T07:30:13Z</updated><author><name>AP News</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-03-19:/tax-policy/health-care-bill-extends-wage-tax-investments-879177a/</id><summary type="html">&lt;div id="subtitle"&gt;Health care bill would increase wage taxes, add new levy on investments for high earners&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;High-income families would be hit with a tax increase on wages and a new levy on investments under &lt;a title="Barack Obama" href="/topic/Barack+Obama" &gt;President Barack Obama&lt;/a&gt;'s health care overhaul bill.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For the first time, the &lt;a title="Medicare" href="/topic/Medicare" &gt;Medicare&lt;/a&gt; payroll tax would be applied to investment income, beginning in 2013. A new 3.8 perce...</summary><category term="Personal Finance"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Social Policy"></category><category term="Health Care Policy"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Michigan"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="American Council for Capital Formation"></category><category term="Jim McDermott"></category><category term="U.S. House Committee on Ways and Means"></category><category term="Dave Camp"></category><category term="Bloomfield"></category><category term="U.S. Congress Joint Committee on Taxation"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="Insurance"></category><category term="Health Insurance"></category><category term="Health Care Reform"></category><category term="Deloitte Tax LLP"></category><category term="Jeffrey Kummer"></category></entry><entry><title>Gridlock On Main Street</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/gridlock-main-street-3141499a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-10-25T09:53:12Z</updated><author><name>Forbes</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-10-25:/tax-policy/gridlock-main-street-3141499a/</id><summary type="html">...</summary><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Federal Budget"></category><category term="Government Spending"></category><category term="War and Conflict"></category><category term="Iraq War"></category><category term="Afghanistan"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="The White House"></category><category term="Washington, DC"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Iraq"></category><category term="Middle East"></category><category term="U.S. Democratic Party"></category><category term="U.S. Republican Party"></category><category term="Zogby International Inc."></category><category term="National Debt"></category></entry><entry><title>Budget crunch a campaign snare</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/budget-crunch-campaign-snare-857596a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-02-27T02:15:21Z</updated><author><name>Las Vegas Sun</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-02-27:/tax-policy/budget-crunch-campaign-snare-857596a/</id><summary type="html">&lt;div id="subtitle"&gt;Candidates for governor face risks by offering, withholding solutions&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt; Being broke is never fun, as Nevadas governor and the men who would replace him can attest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nevadas fiscal crisis leaves few good options, forcing candidates for governor to crank up their creativity:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a title="Jim Gibbons" href="/topic/Jim+Gibbons" &gt;Gov. Jim Gibbons&lt;/a&gt;, who has staked his political survival on being a champion of the anti-tax movement, has tried to say increasing ...</summary><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Illinois"></category><category term="California"></category><category term="Arizona"></category><category term="Nevada"></category><category term="Goldwater Institute"></category><category term="Clark County"></category><category term="The Arizona Republic"></category><category term="Las Vegas Sun"></category><category term="Carson City"></category><category term="Clark County Commission"></category><category term="Clark County School District"></category><category term="Jim Gibbons"></category><category term="Rory Reid"></category><category term="Center on Budget and Policy Priorities"></category><category term="Grover Norquist"></category><category term="Patrick Coolican"></category><category term="Barry Goldwater"></category><category term="SAGE Commission"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="Nicholas Johnson"></category><category term="Brian Sandoval"></category><category term="Public Employee Benefit Program Board"></category></entry><entry><title>Is Concern Over the Budget Deficit Just a Scare Story?</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/economic-stimulus/concern-budget-deficit-scare-story-3124032a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-10-25T08:33:41Z</updated><author><name>About.com</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-10-25:/economic-stimulus/concern-budget-deficit-scare-story-3124032a/</id><summary type="html">...</summary><category term="Economies"></category><category term="Economic Issues"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Federal Budget"></category><category term="Federal Deficits"></category><category term="Government Spending"></category><category term="Recessions and Depressions"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="Central Banking"></category><category term="Economic Crisis"></category><category term="Medicaid"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="U.S. Federal Reserve"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="Economic Stimulus"></category><category term="Center for Economic and Policy Research"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="State and Provincial Budgets"></category></entry><entry><title>Deficit panel can be candid: Budget cuts will hurt</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/deficit-panel-candid-budget-cuts-hurt-847198a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-06-12T18:32:48Z</updated><author><name>AP News</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-06-12:/tax-policy/deficit-panel-candid-budget-cuts-hurt-847198a/</id><summary type="html">&lt;div id="subtitle"&gt;Deficit commission can go where politicians fear to tread: Reducing deficits will hurt people&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a title="Barack Obama" href="/topic/Barack+Obama" &gt;President Barack Obama&lt;/a&gt;'s new deficit commission might give Americans a slap in the face about the sacrifices needed to avoid bankrupting future generations &amp;amp;#8212; maybe working until age 70, paying higher taxes and spending more of their own money for doctors' visits and prescriptions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Obama certainly won'...</summary><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="U.S. Politics"></category><category term="World Politics"></category><category term="U.S. Congressional Politics"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="George W. Bush"></category><category term="The White House"></category><category term="The New York Times Company"></category><category term="Washington, DC"></category><category term="Mitch McConnell"></category><category term="Medicaid"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="George H.W. Bush"></category><category term="Bill Clinton"></category><category term="Wisconsin"></category><category term="Capitol Hill"></category><category term="Wyoming"></category><category term="John McCain"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="CBS Corporation"></category><category term="U.S. Democratic Party"></category><category term="U.S. Republican Party"></category><category term="Douglas Holtz-Eakin"></category><category term="U.S. House Budget Committee"></category><category term="Kent Conrad"></category><category term="Judd Gregg"></category><category term="Alan Simpson"></category><category term="Paul Ryan"></category><category term="Erskine Bowles"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform"></category></entry><entry><title>Paul Ryan's Budgetary Holy Grail</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/tax-policy/paul-ryans-budgetary-holy-grail-3105795a" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-10-25T04:40:36Z</updated><author><name>Forbes</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-10-25:/tax-policy/paul-ryans-budgetary-holy-grail-3105795a/</id><summary type="html">...</summary><category term="Personal Finance"></category><category term="Economic Issues"></category><category term="Economic Development"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Tax Policy"></category><category term="U.S. Politics"></category><category term="World Politics"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Federal Budget"></category><category term="Government Spending"></category><category term="Social Services Funding"></category><category term="Taxes"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="Social Issues"></category><category term="Aging and the Elderly"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="George W. Bush"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Wisconsin"></category><category term="Alaska"></category><category term="Europe"></category><category term="Greece"></category><category term="The Balkans"></category><category term="U.S. Congressional Budget Office"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="Sarah Palin"></category><category term="U.S. Census Bureau"></category><category term="Citizens Against Government Waste"></category><category term="U.S. House Budget Committee"></category><category term="Paul Ryan"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="Insurance"></category><category term="Health Insurance"></category><category term="Tea Party Movement"></category><category term="U.S. Conservative Politics"></category></entry><entry><title>MEDICARE POLL</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/photo/medicare-poll-2403923p" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-12-30T01:00:26Z</updated><author><name>AP News</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-12-30:/photo/medicare-poll-2403923p/</id><summary type="html">Graphic shows poll results on public opinion about &lt;a title="Medicare" href="/topic/Medicare" &gt;Medicare&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div id="copyright"&gt;&lt;div&gt;
        Copyright 2010&amp;#160; &lt;a href="http://www.ap.org"&gt;AP News&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;...</summary><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category></entry><entry><title>Medicare and the Boomers</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/photo/medicare-boomers-2403602p" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-12-29T08:01:23Z</updated><author><name>AP News</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-12-29:/photo/medicare-boomers-2403602p/</id><summary type="html">&lt;a title="Fred Wemer" href="/topic/Fred+Wemer" &gt;Fred Wemer&lt;/a&gt; stands outside his home in &lt;a title="Seattle" href="/topic/Seattle" &gt;Seattle&lt;/a&gt;, in this photo taken Tuesday, Dec. 7, 2010.  Wermer is a retired dentist and says &lt;a title="Medicare" href="/topic/Medicare" &gt;Medicare&lt;/a&gt; pays his medical bills well enough, but he thinks there's a lot of waste in the program and doubts it will be there for his grandchildren. He opposes turning Medicare into a voucher plan for the purchase of private in...</summary><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Seattle"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="Fred Wemer"></category></entry><entry><title>Medicare Cuts</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/photo/medicare-cuts-2379983p" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-11-12T14:03:03Z</updated><author><name>AP News</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-11-12:/photo/medicare-cuts-2379983p/</id><summary type="html">Information relating to &lt;a title="Medicare" href="/topic/Medicare" &gt;Medicare&lt;/a&gt; is seen at the offices of &lt;a title="Kathryn Wagner" href="/topic/Kathryn+Wagner" &gt;Dr. Kathryn Wagner&lt;/a&gt;, a breast cancer surgeon, Wednesday, Nov. 10, 2010, in &lt;a title="San Antonio" href="/topic/San+Antonio" &gt;San Antonio&lt;/a&gt;. Wagner has posted the warning in her waiting room about a different sort of risk to patients' health. The sign says she'll stop taking new Medicare cases if Congress allows looming cuts in doc...</summary><category term="Cancer"></category><category term="Breast Cancer"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="San Antonio"></category><category term="Women's Health"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category></entry><entry><title>Medicare Sleuths</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/photo/medicare-sleuths-2328120p" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-08-08T02:00:13Z</updated><author><name>AP News</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-08-08:/photo/medicare-sleuths-2328120p/</id><summary type="html">FILE - In this Oct. 13, 2009, file photo the &lt;a title="U.S. Senate Committee on Finance" href="/topic/U.S.+Senate+Committee+on+Finance" &gt;Senate Finance Committee&lt;/a&gt;'s ranking &lt;a title="Chuck Grassley" href="/topic/Chuck+Grassley" &gt;Republican Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa&lt;/a&gt;, wears two pairs of glasses while reading during the committee's hearing regarding health care reform on &lt;a title="Capitol Hill" href="/topic/Capitol+Hill" &gt;Capitol Hill&lt;/a&gt; in &lt;a title="Washington, DC" href="/topic/Washing...</summary><category term="Law Enforcement"></category><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Parties"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Social Policy"></category><category term="Health Care Policy"></category><category term="U.S. Politics"></category><category term="World Politics"></category><category term="U.S. Congressional Politics"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="Washington, DC"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="Capitol Hill"></category><category term="Barack Obama"></category><category term="U.S. Senate Committee on Finance"></category><category term="Chuck Grassley"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category><category term="Health Care Reform"></category><category term="U.S. Conservative Politics"></category></entry><entry><title>Social Security Medicare</title><link href="http://economicpolicyinfo.com/photo/social-security-medicare-2327057p" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2010-08-05T15:15:45Z</updated><author><name>AP News</name></author><id>tag:economicpolicyinfo.com,2010-08-05:/photo/social-security-medicare-2327057p/</id><summary type="html">&lt;a title="Michael Astrue" href="/topic/Michael+Astrue" &gt;Social Security Administration Commissioner Michael J. Astrue&lt;/a&gt;, left, accompanied by &lt;a title="Kathleen Sebelius" href="/topic/Kathleen+Sebelius" &gt;Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius&lt;/a&gt;, center, and &lt;a title="Timothy Geithner" href="/topic/Timothy+Geithner" &gt;Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner&lt;/a&gt;, speaks about the Social Security and &lt;a title="Medicare" href="/topic/Medicare" &gt;Medicare&lt;/a&gt; Trustees report, Thursday, A...</summary><category term="Politics"></category><category term="Political Policy"></category><category term="Domestic Policy"></category><category term="Economic Policy"></category><category term="Social Policy"></category><category term="Health Care Policy"></category><category term="U.S. Politics"></category><category term="World Politics"></category><category term="Public Finance"></category><category term="Health Care Issues"></category><category term="United States"></category><category term="Washington, DC"></category><category term="Medicare"></category><category term="U.S. Department of the Treasury"></category><category term="Timothy Geithner"></category><category term="Kathleen Sebelius"></category><category term="Michael Astrue"></category><category term="Paying for Health Care"></category></entry></feed>
